NLnet Bewerbung 2025: Difference between revisions
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
(Optional) This can help us determine if you are the right person to undertake this effort. | (Optional) This can help us determine if you are the right person to undertake this effort. | ||
What you wrote on | What you wrote on [https://nlnet.nl/nren/ nlnet.nl/nren] hit close to home: | ||
"because they were given enough freedom to deviate from their official tasks and do what needed to be done. The beautiful result is the internet: the largest communication infrastructure the world has ever built." | "because they were given enough freedom to deviate from their official tasks and do what needed to be done. The beautiful result is the internet: the largest communication infrastructure the world has ever built." | ||
"potential contributions and innovations 'for the greater good' now find themselves shelved - in some cases for ever." | "potential contributions and innovations 'for the greater good' now find themselves shelved - in some cases for ever." |
Revision as of 21:29, 30 September 2025
Grant deadline: October 1st 2025 12:00 CEST (noon). Referenzen:
Please select a call
In the list of current calls below, please indicate the call topic you are responding to. Note that some larger funds (like the NGI0 Commons Fund) and smaller funds with targeted calls (like NGI Fediversity, TALER and Mobifree — all part of the Next Generation Internet initiative) will have some special scope or conditions. You'd better have a look at the respective guides for applicants before you submit a proposal. If in doubt, submit to our open call and mention in the application that you are okay with us allocating your proposal to the most suitable fund.
- NGI Zero Commons Fund
- NGI TALER
- NGI Mobifree
- NGI Fediversity
- Research & Higher Education Technology Fund (May not be active right now?)
- Open Call
- Other
Contact Information
Your Name | ... |
Email adress | ... |
Phone number | ... |
Organisation | BorgNetzWerk e.V. |
Country | Germany |
General project information
Proposal name | ... |
Website / wiki | ... |
Please be short and to the point in your answers; focus primarily on the what and how, not so much on the why. Add longer descriptions as attachments (see below). If English isn't your first language, don't worry — our reviewers don't care about spelling errors, only about great ideas. We apologise for the inconvenience of having to submit in English. On the up side, you can be as technical as you need to be (but you don't have to). Do stay concrete. Use plain text in your reply only, if you need any HTML to make your point please include this as attachment.
Abstract (1167/1200)
Can you explain the whole project and its expected outcome(s).
We want to increase findability of valuable knowledge hidden in Videos and Podcasts.
We do this by identifying venues that communicate scientifically sound, yet still commonly understandable. These include almost every aspect of science communication (SciCom, or german "WissKomm" - we'll come back to that later), but also lectures and talks at the CCC, a public health podcast and every form of fact-checking. Our focus lies on audiovisual content, which is easily and frequently consumed, yet hard for machines to handle. We want to go beyond scarse metadata and poorly translated transcripts: We are thinking of a Wikisource for current audiovisual media, a catalog for the videos and podcasts you're actually looking for, a navigation aid in the information flood:
We are building the WissKomm Wiki.
An example: EDRi. An insanely important project, 184 videos on the YouTube channel, easily half of them fitting our definition of valuable knowledge in need of reaching people. Yet, after 14 years, 50.000 views. We need an infrastructure to elevate their knowledge from the noise, and help people finding it when they need it.
Contributions to similar projects (0/2500)
Have you been involved with projects or organisations relevant to this project before? And if so, can you tell us a bit about your contributions? (Optional) This can help us determine if you are the right person to undertake this effort.
What you wrote on nlnet.nl/nren hit close to home:
"because they were given enough freedom to deviate from their official tasks and do what needed to be done. The beautiful result is the internet: the largest communication infrastructure the world has ever built." "potential contributions and innovations 'for the greater good' now find themselves shelved - in some cases for ever."
I started this idea with a computer science and mechanical engineering background, as a PhD student in an system engineering chair. Yet I found that there is often no place for charity, for "what needed to be done". My proposal of applying our knowledge management skills on scientific communication was shelved for "let's reconsider in two years". Instead, I left the chair and sought other professors with an open science mindeset, and found the place: TIB – Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology and University Library.
Since 2023, I work in Hannover under the TIB Director and Open Knowledge Foundation Germany Co-Founder Prof. Sören Auer. While I maintain meeting the goals every PhD Student should, he gave me "enough freedom to deviate from my official tasks" and allowed me to:
- work on the WissKomm Wiki from day one,
- visit many key conferences, submit and hold talks and connect with every individual in his & my reach,
- write several proposals, incrementally learning what needs to be done, with the most recent one hopefully dedicating academic funding for the next 2 years,
all while working directly on and with great existing projects:
- Open Research Knowledge Graph
- TIB AV-Portal
- MediaWiki, particularly Wikibase
By the end of the year, I will have:
- published two papers towards science communication knowledge infrastructure [[[1]],2],
- held at least three tech talks [3,4, 5] and four science slams [6, 7, (8,9 not online)]
- had the honor of being the general chair of the MediaWiki Users and Developers Conference Fall 2025
and just now the 39C3 Chaos Communication Congress Submission. Following our transparency values, all our proposals are always open first, most noteworthy the annual startsocial proposal (->2025), which tells everyone exactly who we are, what we do and how we want to reach it, alongside expert feedback.
Requested support
Requested Amount | 45.000 |
Explanation (0/2500)
Explain what the requested budget will be used for? Does the project have other funding sources, both past and present? A breakdown in the main tasks with associated effort is appreciated. Make rates explicit. (If you want, you can in addition attach a full budget at the bottom of the form)
Explain costs for hardware, human labor (including rates used), travel cost to technical meetings, etc.
Compared to existing efforts (0/4000)
Compare your own project with existing or historical efforts.
E.g. what is new, more thorough or otherwise different. (max 4000 characters, be concise)
Technical challenges (0/5000 )
What are significant technical challenges you expect to solve during the project, if any?
(optional but recommended)
Ecosystem (0/5000 )
Describe the ecosystem of the project, and how you will engage with relevant actors and promote the outcomes?
E.g. which actors will you involve? Who should run or deploy your solution to make it a success? (max 2500 characters, be concise)
Attatchments
Attachments: add any additional information about the project that may help us to gain more insight into the proposed effort, for instance a more detailed task description, a justification of costs or relevant endorsements. Attachments should only contain background information, please make sure that the proposal without attachments is self-contained and concise. Don't waste too much time on this. Really.
Accepted formats for attachments are: HTML, PDF, OpenDocument Format and plain text files. (The total size of attachments must not exceed 50 MB)
File 1 | Keine ausgewählt |
File 2 | Keine ausgewählt |
File 3 | Keine ausgewählt |